Meninjau Ulang Batas Usia Pemilihan Kewarganegaraan bagi Anak Berkewarganegaraan Ganda Terbatas di Indonesia: Integrasi Temuan Psikologi Perkembangan dan Prinsip Evolving Capacities dalam Konvensi Hak Anak

Isi Artikel Utama

Arlene Eleanor

Abstrak

Penetapan batas usia 18–21 tahun sebagai masa wajib pemilihan kewarganegaraan bagi Anak Berkewarganegaraan Ganda Terbatas dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2006 merupakan hasil kompromi administratif antar-rezim hukum nasional, yang belum sepenuhnya didasarkan pada justifikasi empiris maupun teoretis mengenai kematangan pengambilan keputusan permanen. Artikel ini menyajikan sintesis teoretis interdisipliner untuk menguji kesesuaian batas usia tersebut melalui empat dimensi analisis: evolusi historis konstruksi usia dewasa dalam hukum global; temuan psikologi perkembangan dan neurosains mengenai perkembangan fungsi eksekutif hingga awal dan pertengahan usia dua puluhan; prinsip evolving capacities dan best interests of the child dalam Konvensi Hak Anak; serta dinamika identitas dalam keluarga transnasional sebagaimana tercermin dalam literatur kebijakan dan praktik administratif di Indonesia. Analisis menunjukkan bahwa rentang usia 18–21 tahun berpotensi belum sepenuhnya mencerminkan stabilitas kognitif-emosional dan konsolidasi identitas yang umumnya diperlukan untuk keputusan kewarganegaraan yang bersifat permanen. Literatur psikologi dan neurosains mengindikasikan bahwa perkembangan fungsi eksekutif dan stabilitas identitas cenderung berlanjut hingga awal hingga pertengahan usia dua puluhan. Berdasarkan temuan tersebut, artikel ini merekomendasikan peninjauan kembali batas akhir pemilihan kewarganegaraan dengan mempertimbangkan rentang usia yang lebih sesuai secara perkembangan, disertai model keputusan bertahap (phased decision making), penguatan literasi kewarganegaraan sepanjang hayat, dan harmonisasi batas usia dalam hukum nasional. Kontribusi artikel ini terletak pada integrasi argumentasi hukum, psikologi perkembangan, dan kerangka hak anak ke dalam konstruksi normatif yang koheren untuk menilai batas usia pemilihan kewarganegaraan ABG di Indonesia.

Rincian Artikel

Bagian

Artikel

Cara Mengutip

Arlene Eleanor. (2025). Meninjau Ulang Batas Usia Pemilihan Kewarganegaraan bagi Anak Berkewarganegaraan Ganda Terbatas di Indonesia: Integrasi Temuan Psikologi Perkembangan dan Prinsip Evolving Capacities dalam Konvensi Hak Anak. Jurnal Identitas, 5(2), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.66109/jid.v5i2.58

Referensi

Andriani, D & Prasetyo, DA 2023, ‘Legal Protection of The Rights of Indonesian Citizens for Children in Lifetime Mixed Marriages’, International Journal of Social Service and Research, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 940-946, DOI: https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i4.327.

Baltes, PB, Libdeberger, L & Staudinger, UM 2007, ‘Life Span Theory in Developmental Psychology’, dalam Damon, W & Lerner, MR (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology. Volume 1, Theoretical Models of Human Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0111, John Wiley & Son Inc., New Jersey, pp. 569-664.

Boni-Saenz, AA 2022, ‘Legal Age’, Boston College Law Review, Vol. 63, pp. 522-569.

Cahyaningsih, DT, Sulistyono, A & Purwadi, H 2023, ‘Harmonization of the Legal Age in the Context of Private Law as a Means of Achieving Legal Certainty and Justice in Indonesia’, Proceedings of the International Conference On Law, Economics, and Health (ICLEH 2022), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-024-4_35.

Cohen, EF 2005, ‘Neither seen nor heard: Children’s citizenship in contemporary democracies’, Citizenship Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 221-240. DOI: https://10.1080/13621020500069687.

Delila, K 2018, ‘The Right of a Child to Choose a Citizenship in Accordance with Indonesian Legislation Number 12, 2006 on Indonesian Citizenship’, Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2018): Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Vol. 251, Bandung, (https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/acec-18/articles). DOI: 10.2991/acec-18.2018.5.

Dewi, CPK, Husodo, JA & Firdausy, AG 2024, ‘Legal Status Of Underage Children With Dual Citizenship Related To Inheritance’, International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 414-419. DOI: https://10.51601/ijersc.v5i3.833.

Diamantina, A 2014, ‘Protection to child citizenship right in mixed marriage in Indonesia’, South East Asia, Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 29-33.

Emanuele, P 2019, ‘A social psychological approach to citizenship acquisition: Naturalized minority and national majority perspectives’, Doctoral thesis, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.

Grijns, M & Horii, H 2024, ‘When do “children” become “adults”? Transitions in children’s rights and child marriage’, in Regilme, SSF (Ed.), Children’s rights in crisis, (pp. 195-214), Manchester University Press, Manchester. DOI: 10.7765/9781526170149.00017.

Hamilton, VE 2016, ‘Adulthood in Law and Culture’, Tulane Law Review, Vol. 91, No. 1, Rev. 55, (https://www.tulanelawreview.org/pub/91-hamilton).

Hay, ME 2009, ‘Incremental Independence: Conforming the Law to the Process of Adolescence’, William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 663-684.

Iqbal, K, Hasanah, S, Jiwantara, FA & Septyanun, N 2025, ‘Rights Fulfillment of Children From Mixed Marriages to Obtain Indonesian Citizenship Based on Law Number 12 of 2006’, International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Science, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 1656-1665, DOI: https://10.56338/ijhess.v7i4.8160.

Loo, WL 2010, ‘Full Contractual Capacity: Use of Age for Conferment of Capacity’, Singapore Journal of Law Studies, Vol. 20, No. 10. pp. 328-351. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.729630869676955.

Martinelli, I, Priyono, FXJ & Yunanto, Y 2023, ‘Reimagining legal subject competence: Exploring the authority to act in Indonesian marriage law’, Indonesia Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 124-137.

Novitasari, AF, Luth, T, Djumikasih & Chanifah, N 2024, ‘A Comparative Analysis of the Interpretation of Maturity Under the Law of Marriage across ASEAN Countries’, Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 210-217. DOI: 10.62768/PLPA/2024/13/2/02.

Sihombing, EN, Widati, S & Hadita, C 2022, ‘Limited Dual Citizenship Age Limit’, Law and Humanities Quarterly Reviews, Vol 1, No. 3, pp. 116-121. DOI:10.31014/aior.1996.01.03.26.

Tunick, M 2023, ‘State Authority, Parental Authority, and the Rights of Mature Minors’, The Journal of Ethics, Vol. 27, pp. 7-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-021-09379-x .

Ziyana, N. n.d, ‘Age of Majority and Evolving Capacity of the Child in a Plural Legal System’, Academia, n.d, dilihat 20 Juli 2025, (https://www.academia.edu/7501894/Age_of_Majority_and_Evolving_Capacity_of_the_Child_In_a_Plural_Legal_System).