Kerelawanan, CSR, dan Kewarganegaraan Partisipatif: Pengalaman Relawan Perempuan Tzu Chi Cabang Sinar Mas di Wilayah Terpencil

Main Article Content

Widodo

Abstract

Artikel ini mengkaji kerelawanan perempuan dalam ekosistem Tanggung Jawab Sosial Korporasi (CSR) sebagai praktik kewarganegaraan partisipatif yang dimediasi oleh media digital di wilayah terpencil. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan fenomenologi sosial Alfred Schutz terhadap enam Relawan Dharma Wanita Tzu Chi Cabang Sinar Mas yang mendampingi suami di wilayah perkebunan di Sumatra, dan Kalimantan. Analisis dilakukan dengan merekonstruksi because motive dan in-order-to motive setiap informan serta membandingkan pola pengalaman dan pemaknaan antarinforman. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa publikasi digital tidak semata-mata dimaknai sebagai dokumentasi kegiatan, tetapi sebagai bagian dari keterlibatan sosial yang memungkinkan relawan menghadirkan pengalaman komunitas ke ruang publik yang lebih luas, membangun keterhubungan sosial, dan memperluas perhatian terhadap persoalan masyarakat. Dari pola hubungan antara pengalaman biografis, motif, dan orientasi tindakan, penelitian mengonstruksikan tiga tipifikasi pengalaman, yaitu Pejuang, Pembelajar, dan Panggilan Hati. Ketiganya bukan jenis atau model kewarganegaraan, melainkan variasi pemaknaan relawan terhadap keterlibatan mereka dalam praktik kewarganegaraan partisipatif. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ekosistem CSR dapat menyediakan ruang institusional bagi keterlibatan sosial warga, sementara media digital menjadi medium yang memperluas visibilitas pengalaman komunitas. Kontribusi penelitian terletak pada perluasan medan empiris kajian kewarganegaraan partisipatif di Indonesia melalui pengalaman perempuan dalam kerelawanan, CSR, dan publikasi digital di wilayah terpencil.

Article Details

Section

Article

How to Cite

Widodo. (2025). Kerelawanan, CSR, dan Kewarganegaraan Partisipatif: Pengalaman Relawan Perempuan Tzu Chi Cabang Sinar Mas di Wilayah Terpencil. Jurnal Identitas, 5(2), 74-107. https://doi.org/10.66109/jid.v5i2.60

References

Alwaton, Y 2023, ‘Jurnalisme Warga sebagai Alternatif Literasi Media dan Partisipasi bagi Publik’, Avant Garde: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 165–177. DOI: https://10.36080/ag.v11i2.2644.

Badan Pusat Statistik 2024, Berita Resmi Statistik: Profil Kemiskinan di Indonesia September 2024, dilihat 21 Desember 2025. (https://www.bps.go.id), Media Release (https://www.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2025/01/15/2401/persentase-penduduk-miskin-september-2024-turun-menjadi-8-57-persen-.html).

Bhinekawati, YR 2017, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat: Studi Kasus Program CSR di Indonesia›, Jurnal Administrasi Publik, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 112–125.

Blowfield, M & Frynas, JG 2005, ‘Setting New Agendas: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Developing World’, International Affairs, Vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 499–513. DOI: https://10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00469.x.

Carpentier, N 2011, Media and Participation: A Site of Ideological-Democratic Struggle, Intellect Books, Bristol.

Carroll, AB 1991, ‘The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders’, Business Horizons, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 39–48. DOI:10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G.

Cornwall, A 2004, ‹Spaces for Transformation? Reflections on Issues of Power and Difference in Participation in Development›, dalam Hickey, S. dan Mohan, G. (eds.) Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation?, Zed Books, London.

Couldry, N 2010, Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics After Neoliberalism, Sage, London.

Couldry, N 2012, Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice, Polity Press, Cambridge.

Fusch, PI & Ness, LR 2015, ‘Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research’, The Qualitative Report, Vol. 20, No. 9, pp. 1408–1416. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281.

Guest, G, Bunce, A & Johnson, L 2006, ‘How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability’, Field Methods, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 59–82. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05279903.

Henrard, K 2013, The Interplay between Citizenship and Minority Rights: Conceptual and Normative Explorations, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden.

Herrera, L 2014, ‹Youth and the Politics of the Present: Coping with Chaos and Ambivalence›, dalam Herrera, L. dan Sakr, M. (eds.) Wired Citizenship: Youth Learning and Activism in the Middle East, Routledge, London.

Isin, EF 2002, Being Political: Genealogies of Citizenship, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

Isin, EF & Nielsen, GM (eds.) 2008, Acts of Citizenship, Zed Books, London.

Isin, EF & Turner, BS (eds.) 2002, Handbook of Citizenship Studies, SAGE Publications, London.

Krismiyati, B, Setyaningsih, E & Pramono, SE 2023, ‹Digital Activism and Political Participation among Indonesian Youth›, Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 45–58.

Lister, R 1997, Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, New York University Press, New York.

Lister, R 2007, ‘Inclusive Citizenship: Realizing the Potential’, Citizenship Studies, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 49–61. DOI: 10.1080/13621020601099856.

Matten, D & Crane, A 2005, ‘Corporate Citizenship: Toward an Extended Theoretical Conceptualization’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 166–179. DOI:https://10.5465/amr.2005.15892764.

Marshall, TH 1992, Citizenship and Social Class, Pluto Press, London.

Miles, MB, Huberman, AM & Saldana, J 2014, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd edn., SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Mutsvairo, B. (ed.) 2016, Digital Activism in Africa: Youth, Citizenship and Social Change, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Ritonga, R & Syahputra, I 2019, ‘Citizen Journalism and Public Participation in the Era of New Media in Indonesia: From Street to Tweet’, Media and Communication, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 79–90. DOI: 10.17645/mac.v7i3.2094.

Rodriguez, C 2001, Fissures in the Mediascape: An International Study of Citizens, Media, Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ.

Rudito, B. dan Famiola, M. (2013) ‹Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia: From Compliance to Strategic Advantage›, Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(2), pp. 89–104. Bandung: Institut Teknologi Bandung.

Schutz, A 1970, On Phenomenology and Social Relations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Seto, A 2017, Netizenship, Activism and Online Community Transformation in Indonesia, Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.

Stephanie, EC 2024, ‘The Impact of Citizen Journalism on Local Culture and Public Participation: Analyzing Community Engagement and Media Influence’, Kampret Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 34–41.

Tse, CH 2024, ‘Alternative News Values in Community Citizen Journalism: The Case of PeoPo in Taiwan’, Journalism Practice, pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2024.2385999.

Visser, W 2010, ‘The Age of Responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the New DNA of Business’, Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 7–22. DOI: 10.3127/ajbsge.v5i3.325.

Waagstein, PR 2011, ‘The Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia: Problems and Implications’, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 98, No. 3, pp. 455–466. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-010-0587-x.

Wibisono, Y 2007, Membedah Konsep dan Aplikasi CSR, Fascho Publishing, Gresik.

Widodo 2025, Studi Fenomenologi: Pengalaman Relawan Dharma Wanita Tzu Chi Cabang Sinar Mas di Sinar Mas Agribusiness and Food dalam Melakukan Publikasi Digital. Tesis Magister, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta.

Yayasan Buddha Tzu Chi Indonesia 2019, ‘Memupuk Peran Para Ibu dalam Kemanusiaan’, Yayasan Buddha Tzu Chi Indonesia, dilihat 10 Januari 2024, (https://www.tzuchi.or.id/read-berita/memupuk-peran-para-ibu-dalam-kemanusiaan/8426).

Yayasan Buddha Tzu Chi Indonesia 2021, ‘Program Desa Cinta Kasih, Pemberian Mainan Edukasi dan Poster Edukasi bagi PAUD’, Yayasan Buddha Tzu Chi Indonesia, dilihat 10 Januari 2024, (https://www.tzuchi.or.id/read-berita/program-desa-cinta-kasih-pemberian-mainan-edukasi-dan-poster-edukasi-bagi-paud/9738).

Yuval-Davis, N 2007, ‘Intersectionality, Citizenship and Contemporary Politics of Belonging’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 561–574. DOI: 10.1080/13698230701660220.